More men than women are admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide.
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
In studies of sex differences in ICU admissions from North America, the United Kingdom and Europe, the percentage of female patients ranges from 35% to 45%.
1,
2,
3,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10
This simple observation likely reflects complex sex differences in the incidence, presentation and management of critical illness.
Mahmood K, Eldeirawi K, Wahidi MM. Association of gender with outcomes in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2012; 16: R92.
Garland A, Olafson K, Ramsey CD, et al. Reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness. Crit Care 2018; 22: 208.
Hollinger A, Gayat E, Feliot E, et al. Gender and survival of critically ill patients: results from the FROG-ICU study. Ann Intensive Care 2019; 9: 43.
Park J, Jeon K, Chung CR, et al. A nationwide analysis of intensive care unit admissions, 2009–2014 — the Korean ICU National Data (KIND) study. J Crit Care 2018; 44: 24-30.
Raine R, Goldfrad C, Rowan K, Black N. Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56: 418-23.
Reinikainen M, Niskanen M, UUsaro A, Ruokonen E. Impact of gender on treatment and outcome of ICU patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 984-90.
Mahmood K, Eldeirawi K, Wahidi MM. Association of gender with outcomes in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2012; 16: R92.
Garland A, Olafson K, Ramsey CD, et al. Reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness. Crit Care 2018; 22: 208.
Hollinger A, Gayat E, Feliot E, et al. Gender and survival of critically ill patients: results from the FROG-ICU study. Ann Intensive Care 2019; 9: 43.
Raine R, Goldfrad C, Rowan K, Black N. Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56: 418-23.
Reinikainen M, Niskanen M, UUsaro A, Ruokonen E. Impact of gender on treatment and outcome of ICU patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 984-90.
Samuelsson C, Sjoberg F, Karlstrom G, et al. Gender differences in outcome and use of resources do exist in Swedish intensive care, but to no advantage for women of premenopausal age. Crit Care 2015; 19: 129.
Valentin A, Jordan B, Lang T, et al. Gender-related differences in intensive care: a multiple-center cohort study of therapeutic interventions and outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 1901-7.
Fowler RA, Sabur N, Li P, et al. Sex-and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care. CMAJ 2007; 177: 1513-9.
Zettersten E, Jaderling G, Bell M, Larsson E. Sex and gender aspects on intensive care. A cohort study. J Crit Care 2020; 55: 22-7.
Previous studies focused on quantifying sex differences in illness severity and outcomes from ICU admission, with conflicting results. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Mahmood K, Eldeirawi K, Wahidi MM. Association of gender with outcomes in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2012; 16: R92.
Garland A, Olafson K, Ramsey CD, et al. Reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness. Crit Care 2018; 22: 208.
Hollinger A, Gayat E, Feliot E, et al. Gender and survival of critically ill patients: results from the FROG-ICU study. Ann Intensive Care 2019; 9: 43.
Raine R, Goldfrad C, Rowan K, Black N. Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56: 418-23.
Reinikainen M, Niskanen M, UUsaro A, Ruokonen E. Impact of gender on treatment and outcome of ICU patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 984-90.
Samuelsson C, Sjoberg F, Karlstrom G, et al. Gender differences in outcome and use of resources do exist in Swedish intensive care, but to no advantage for women of premenopausal age. Crit Care 2015; 19: 129.
Valentin A, Jordan B, Lang T, et al. Gender-related differences in intensive care: a multiple-center cohort study of therapeutic interventions and outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 1901-7.
Fowler RA, Sabur N, Li P, et al. Sex-and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care. CMAJ 2007; 177: 1513-9.
First, the sex imbalance is not evenly distributed across diagnostic categories. 5, 8, 9
Raine R, Goldfrad C, Rowan K, Black N. Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56: 418-23.
Valentin A, Jordan B, Lang T, et al. Gender-related differences in intensive care: a multiple-center cohort study of therapeutic interventions and outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 1901-7.
Fowler RA, Sabur N, Li P, et al. Sex-and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care. CMAJ 2007; 177: 1513-9.
Zettersten E, Jaderling G, Bell M, Larsson E. Sex and gender aspects on intensive care. A cohort study. J Crit Care 2020; 55: 22-7.
Schoeneberg C, Kauther MD, Hussmann B, et al. Gender-specific differences in severely injured patients between 2002 and 2011: data analysis with matched-pair analysis. Crit Care 2013; 17: R277.
Johnston A, Mesana TG, Lee DS, et al. Sex differences in long-term survival after major cardiac surgery: a population-based cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8: e013260.
Nienaber CA, Fattori R, Mehta RH, et al. Gender-related differences in acute aortic dissection. Circulation 2004; 109: 3014-21.
De Marchis GM, Schaad C, Fung C, et al. Gender-related differences in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a hospital based study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2017; 157: 82-7.
Gupta D, Keogh B, Chung KF, et al. Characteristics and outcome for admissions to adult, general critical care units with acute severe asthma: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database. Crit Care 2004; 8: R112-21.
Second, there is a wide variation in the reported percentage of female ICU patients in studies performed at different times in different regions of the world. Therefore, it is unclear if this variation is due to differences in casemix, differences in sociocultural context or changes over time.
This study examines these issues by systematically describing the sex balance in ICU admissions in Australia and New Zealand. We used the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Resource and Outcome Evaluation (CORE) Adult Patient Database (APD). Our primary objective was to quantify the relative contribution of each major diagnostic category to the overall preponderance of men admitted to an ICU in Australia and New Zealand. Previous researchers have identified a sex imbalance across multiple diagnostic groups of critical illness; 5, 6, 10
Raine R, Goldfrad C, Rowan K, Black N. Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56: 418-23.
Reinikainen M, Niskanen M, UUsaro A, Ruokonen E. Impact of gender on treatment and outcome of ICU patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 984-90.
Zettersten E, Jaderling G, Bell M, Larsson E. Sex and gender aspects on intensive care. A cohort study. J Crit Care 2020; 55: 22-7.
Methods
Population
We undertook a retrospective cross-sectional study of ICU admissions in the ANZICS CORE APD between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2018. The APD lists more than 2.4 million ICU episodes since 1993. Presently, over 180 000 ICU admissions are submitted every year, estimated to account for 90% of ICU admissions in Australia and 70% of admissions in New Zealand.
16
Sex is recorded as part of basic demographic data in this registry, taken from the patient’s hospital record.
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation. ANZICS CORE 2018 report. Melbourne: ANZICS, 2019. https://www.anzics.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2018-ANZICS-CORE-Report.pdf (viewed Dec 2020).
We excluded patients aged under 17 years; patients with missing diagnoses, sex classification or outcome; and repeat ICU admissions during the same hospital visit. Patients classified as “intersex” or “indeterminate sex” were excluded from the analysis because this sex classification was only introduced to the registry in 2017.
Diagnostic categories
We considered 23 diagnostic categories based on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III-J categories used in the APD.
16
Ten diagnostic groups had both postoperative and non-operative categories: cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, neurological, trauma, metabolic, haematological, renal and genitourinary, female-specific, and musculoskeletal. The “sepsis” and “other” diagnoses had only non-operative categories, and “male-specific” diagnoses had a postoperative category only.
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation. ANZICS CORE 2018 report. Melbourne: ANZICS, 2019. https://www.anzics.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2018-ANZICS-CORE-Report.pdf (viewed Dec 2020).
The female-specific diagnostic category included obstetric and gynaecological conditions, and the male-specific category included disorders of male urogenital tract. Postoperative admission was defined as admission to the ICU directly from the operating theatre or recovery after surgery.
Statistical analysis
Categorical variables are reported as counts with percentages to one decimal place. Given the size of the dataset, to increase robustness we set significance level at 0.01 (P < 0.01 indicates statistical significance) and reported 99% confidence intervals (CIs). The exact binomial test was used for comparisons of binary data and χ2 tests for other categorical variables. We defined a significant sex imbalance within diagnostic categories as less than 48% or greater than 52% of women. The relative contribution of each diagnostic category to the overall sex imbalance was calculated as the absolute difference between male and female admissions in the diagnostic category divided by the absolute difference between total male and total female admissions in the entire dataset.
Simple linear regression was used to assess the association between the percentage of female patients and year of admission. Multivariate logistic regression calculated the odds of an ICU admission being a female patient. Therefore, odds ratios (ORs) greater than one are associated with female ICU admission and ORs less than one are associated with male ICU admission. The multivariate model included the following categorical variables identified a priori as potentially associated with sex balance: APACHE III-J diagnostic category (postoperative and non-operative subcategories considered separately), patient age (10-year cohorts), admission year, hospital type (tertiary, metropolitan, rural/regional or private), geographic region (New Zealand or individual states and territories of Australia), and planned versus unplanned ICU admission.
Sex-specific diagnostic categories were excluded from the multivariate logistic regression. Year of admission was firstly modelled as a categorical variable and secondly modelled as a continuous variable to enable assessment of annual change over time. Results are reported as ORs (99% CI), with a Wald 𝑥2 statistic enabling a comparison of the relative significance of variables in the model.
Statistical analyses were performed with Stata 16.1 (StataCorp) and SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute).